Action research through the lens of the ‘rendang’ analogy
Article Sidebar
-
Analogy, Contextuality, Continuity, Quality, Rendang
Abstract
This article explores similarities between the preparation of rendang –a rich, concentrated curry that’s sweet, spicy, and savoury– and the practice of action research, with a focus on examples of action research studies conducted by Malaysian academics. Drawing upon our personal and professional experiences in the Malaysian context, we illustrate the philosophy and methodology of action research through the process of making rendang. The three central tenets observed in both domains are contextuality, continuity and quality. Through the lens of these shared attributes and culturally rich practices, our aim is to facilitate an understanding of action research among novice researchers, particularly in the Malaysian context.
Full text article
References
Abdul Raji, M. N., Ab Karim, S., Che Ishak, F. A., & Arshad, M. M. (2017). Past and present practices of the Malay food heritage and culture in Malaysia. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 4(4), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2017.11.001
Ahmad, S. (2016). Improving the Quality of Primary ESL Teachers’ Shared Reading Practice: A Collaborative Action Research [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Balakrishnan, V., & Claiborne, L. (2017). Participatory action research in culturally complex societies: Opportunities and challenges. Educational Action Research, 25(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2016.1206480
Boal, A. (1979). Theater of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496626
Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Fleming, T. (2011). Models of lifelong learning: An overview. In M. London (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning (pp. 29-39). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Glenn, M., Sullivan, B., Roche, M., & McDonagh, C. (2023). Action Research for the Classroom: A Guide to Values-Based Research in Practice. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003288183
Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2015). The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hinchey, P. (2008). Action Research Primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Indriani, V., Suryati, T., & Apriantini, A. (2022). Characteristics of beef rendang with the addition of red ginger (Zingiber officinale var. Rubrum) during storage at room temperature. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Hasil Ternak, 17(3), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jitek.2022.017.03.3
Ivankova, N. V. (2015). Mixed Methods Applications in Action Research. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
Johnsen, H. C. G., & Normann, R. (2004). When research and practice collide: The role of action research when there is a conflict of interest with stakeholders. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17, 207-235. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAA.0000031698.50541.f9
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge.
Koshy, V. (2009). Action Research for Improving Educational Practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Lawson, H. A., Caringi, J. C., Pyles, L., Jurkowski, J. M., & Bozlak, C. T. (2015). Participatory Action Research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Mat Noor, M. S. A. (2021). Annual Report 2021. Negeri Sembilan: Malaysian Action Research Network.
Mat Noor, M. S. A. (2022). Curiouser and curiouser!’: A reconnaissance of my doctoral study as a ‘teacher-researcher. PRACTICE, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2022.2065924
Mat Noor, M. S. A., & Ahmad, S. (2022). Kajian tindakan dalam pendidikan [Action research in education]. In M. A. Idris, M. Hamidi & N. K. Ahmad (Eds.), Metodologi Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dalam Sains Sosial [Quantitative and Qualitative Methodology in Social Science] (pp. 133-149). Kuala Lumpur: UM Press.
Mat Noor, M. S. A., & Shafee, A. (2021). The role of critical friends in action research: a framework for design and implementation. Practitioner Research, 3, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2021.3.1
Mat Noor, M. S. A., Ahmad, S., & Zainudin, Z. (2020). Initiating a professional development on action research during the COVID-19 pandemic. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/3nd9k
Mat Noor, M. S. A., Ahmad, S., & Zainudin, Z. (2021). Pelaksanaan program pembangunan profesionalisme berterusan secara dalam talian (e-PPB) mengenai kajian tindakan semasa pandemik Covid-19 [The implementation of online continuing professional development (e-CPD) programme on action research during Covid-19 pandemic]. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 8(4), 51-64.
McNiff, J. (2013). Action Research: Principles and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112755
Md Shahbudin, Amirul Shah (2006). The Implementation of Target Costing as a Tool for Change within an Organisation: An Action Research of Nestle Rowntree Division [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. University of Lancaster.
Md. Nor, N., Md. Sharif, M. S., Mohd Zahari, M. S., Mohd Salleh, H., Isha, N., & Muhammad, R. (2012). The transmission modes of Malay traditional food knowledge within generations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.017
Md. Sharif, M. S., Mohd Zahari, M. S., Muhammad, R., & Md. Nor, N. (2015). Traditional Hari Raya food: An insight from three Malay women generations. In S. Mohd Radzi, M. F. Saiful Bakhtiar, Z. Mohi, M. S. Zahari, N. Sumarjan, C. T. Chik & F. I. Anuar (Eds.), Theory and Practice in Hospitality and Tourism Research (pp. 505-509). London: CRC Press.
Mohd Meerah, T. S., & Osman, K. (2013). What is ‘action’ in action research: A Malaysian exposure. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 148. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p148
Nahar, N., Ab Karim, S., Karim, R., Ghazali, H., & Krauss, S. E. (2018). The globalization of Malaysia national cuisine: A concept of ‘Gastrodiplomacy’. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Culinary Arts, 10(1), 42-58.
Nurmufida, M., Wangrimen, G. H., Reinalta, R., & Leonardi, K. (2017). Rendang: the treasure of minangkabau. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 4(4), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2017.10.005
Othman, N., & Chia, S. Y. (2016). The challenges of action research implementation in Malaysian schools. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 24(1), 43-52.
Pang, J. C., Cheong, L. S., & bin Abdul Razak, A. Z. (2017). Role of Support Staff in Improving Peer Mediation and Conflict Resolution Among Individuals with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Special Needs Education, 7, 24-44.
Perry, M. S. (2017). Feasting on culture and identity: Food functions in a multicultural and transcultural Malaysia. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(4), 184-199. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-14
Phaik-Lah, K. (1997). The environments of action research in Malaysia. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International Action Research: A Casebook for Educational Reform (pp. 238-243). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973721
Puteh-Behak, F. (2014). Empowerment in participatory action research conducted in Malaysia. Action Learning and Action Research Journal, 20(2), 130-161.
Rahman, F. (2020). Tracing the origins of rendang and its development. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-020-00065-1
Rajah, C. S. S. (2012). Heavenly Fragrance: Cooking with Aromatic Asian Herbs, Fruits, Spices and Seasonings. Clarendon, VT: Tuttle Publishing.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2015). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (3rd ed.). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921290
Schön, D. A. (1992). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
Stevens, M. (2004). All about Braising: The Art of Uncomplicated Cooking. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5
Tekin, A. K., & Kotaman, H. (2013). The epistemological perspectives on action research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p81
Thambu, N. (2017). Perkembangan pemikiran moral melalui teater forum: Satu kajian tindakan [The development of moral thinking through theater forum: An action research]. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 12-30.
Yoon, S. J., & Gruba, P. (2019). Evaluating normalisation: An argument-based approach. System, 83, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.008
Zainudin, Z. (2005). Pemantapan Interaksi Verbal dalam Pengajaran Fizik melalui Reflektif: Satu Kajian Tindakan Kolaboratif [Strengthening Verbal Interaction in Physics Teaching through Reflective: A Collaborative Action Research] [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Zainurin, F. (2021). An Autoethnographic Exploration of Malaysian Rendang [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Auckland University of Technology.
Zuber‐Skerritt, O., & Fletcher, M. (2007). The quality of an action research thesis in the social sciences. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(4), 413-436. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710829983
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 M. S. A. Mat Noor et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
